The
former civil servant has told detectives investigating the activities
of paedophiles in national politics that the Metropolitan Police’s
Special Branch was orchestrating the child-sex lobbying group in the
late 1970s and early 1980s.
The whistleblower,
who has spoken exclusively to the Sunday Express, says he was also
warned off asking why such a notorious group was being handed government
money.
It emerged late last year that PIE was
twice gave amounts of £35,000 in Home Office funding
between 1977 and
1980, the £70,000 total equivalent to over £400,000 in today’s money.
Those
details surfaced only after the whistleblower highlighted his concerns
to campaigning Labour MP Tom Watson and his revelations have triggered
an ongoing Home Office inquiry into why the cash was given to PIE which
was abolished in 1985 after a number of prosecutions.
Until
now, speculation about the grant has centred on Clifford Hindley, the
late Home Office manager who approved the payments. However, the
whistleblower told the Sunday Express he thought higher and more
sinister powers were at play.
He has given a
formal statement to that effect to detectives from Operation Fernbridge,
which is looking into allegations of historic sex abuse at the Elm
Guest House in south-west London.
At that time, questioning anything to do with Special Branch, especially within the Home Office, was a ‘no-no’.
PIE, now
considered one of the most notorious groups of the era, had gained
respectability in political circles. Its members are said to have
included establishment figures, and disgraced Liberal MP Cyril Smith was
a friend of founder member Peter Righton.
In
1981, Tory MP Geoffrey Dickens used Parliamentary privilege to name Sir
Peter Hayman, the deputy director of MI6, as a member of PIE and an
active paedophile. In 1983 Mr Dickens gave the Home Office a dossier of
what he claimed was evidence of a paedophile network of “big, big names,
people in positions of power, influence and responsibility”. The Home
Office says the dossier no longer exists.
Whistleblower
Mr X, whose identity we have agreed to protect, became a very senior
figure in local government before retiring a few years ago. In the late
1970s and early 1980s, he was a full-time consultant in the Home
Office’s Voluntary Services Unit run by Clifford Hindley.
In
1979 Mr X was asked to examine a funding renewal application for PIE,
but he became concerned because the organisation’s goal of seeking to
abolish the age of consent “conflicted” with the child protection
policies of the Department of Health and Social Security and asked for a
meeting with Mr Hindley, his immediate boss.
Mr
X recalled: “I raised my concerns, but he told me that I was to drop
them. Hindley gave three reasons for this. He said PIE was an
organisation with cachet and that its work in this field was respected.
“He
said this was a renewal of an existing grant and that under normal Home
Office practice a consultant such as myself would not be involved in
the decision-making process.
“And he said PIE
was being funded at the request of Special Branch which found it
politically useful to identify people who were paedophiles. This led me
not to pursue my objections. At that time, questioning anything to do
with Special Branch, especially within the Home Office, was a ‘no-no’.
“I
was under the clear belief that I was being instructed to back off and
that his reference to Special Branch was expected to make me to do so.
“Hindley
didn’t give me an explicit explanation of what Special Branch would do
with information it gleaned from funding PIE, but I formed the belief
that it was part of an undercover operation or activity. I was aware a
lot of people in the civil service or political arena had an interest in
obtaining information like that which could be used as a sort of
blackmail.”
He said he asked for a file the Home
Office kept on PIE, but his request was refused. However, he was
certain then Tory Home Office Minister Tim Raison, who died in 2011,
must have signed the 1980 funding application.
Mr
X has given a formal written statement to the inquiry set up last year
into former Home Office links with PIE but has refused to meet the
inquiry in person because he fears “repercussions” under the Official
Secrets Act.
Yesterday Tom Watson said: “The
whole sorry business makes it absolutely imperative the Home Secretary
bows to the will of the 114 MPs demanding a full, fearless public
investigation into child sexual abuse.”
Special
Branch was an integral part of the intelligence service gathering
intelligence on spies and political threats to the state. In 2005 it
merged with the anti-terrorism branch to form a Counter Terrorism
Command.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.